National Parks Inc.

5

October 16, 2012 by Anders Ingemarson

This week, let’s get away from the sometimes poisonous air of the election and get out in the open. Let’s visit one of our fabulous National Parks. I love National Parks; I have probably visited close to thirty, I think. Maria and I recently spent a week touring southern Utah which is in a class by itself when it comes to natural wonders. If you haven’t been, I strongly recommend adding it to your bucket list. The view from Angel’s landing in Zion will be with you for the rest of your life.

While driving through the amazing landscape I started pondering what will happen to our National Parks when we separate state and the economy. Compared to the size of most other government entities, our National Parks are marginal. But they are huge emotionally. We’re talking about a “national treasure” here. Nothing stirs the emotions as reading about uranium mining in the Grand Canyon and drilling for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (I know it’s not a National Park, but you get the point). But from a principled point of view, they should be separated from the state. Why? Because National Parks are not part of the core government functions required for the protection of our individual rights. And we don’t have the right to force our fellow Americans to pay for what some may not consider a value. After all, the value of a “national treasure” is only the sum total of the value individual Americans put on it, and that value varies from person to person; for some it’s zero, for others huge.

Who says we cannot have privately owned National Parks? I suspect the visiting experience would be significantly improved with more entrepreneurial involvement. No, I’m not necessarily lamenting the efforts of some dedicated people at the National Park Service (NPS). But it is a government agency, and the red tape tends to curb the enthusiasm of even the most committed individuals.

So how does one go about the separation? I suggest taking NPS public, issuing one share to each American of voting age. This would include other national designations under the NPS umbrella as well such as National Monuments, National Historic Sites, etc. As part of the package, we’d remove all federal regulations and restrictions, and face out federal funding over a few years. Then we’ll sit back and watch what happens. Or get involved if this is an area that is close to your heart.

I don’t have a crystal ball, but I suspect we’ll see National Parks Inc. becoming more focused on its core assets, the top 20 or so sites, while selling off others to other individuals or groups (I would put a ban on selling to state and local government entities; separating state and the economy applies to all levels of government, and just shifting level doesn’t do us any good). I strongly believe we’d experience a surge in private investments. Not only for potential monetary profit, but for immaterial gains, as a lot of people put a personal value on our national parks, monuments and historic sites. Speaking for myself, I’d love to adopt a hoodoo in Bryce, support a grizzly in Grand Teton, or sponsor a gondola to the bottom of the Grand Canyon.

5 thoughts on “National Parks Inc.

  1. Martin L Buchanan says:

    I believe transfers of ownership with conditions attached are consistent with a free society. One possible ownership scheme in a free society is one non-transferrable share per citizen. The citizens then own the national parks perpetually, without transfer of ownership to more centralized buyers. Without coercive power, the parks would be self supporting through modest fees. Any subsidies (senior citizen discounts for example) would need approval by a plurality of owners. It would be reasonable for the “charter” / governing principles of the National Parks to be amendable as the USA Constitution is amendable, with difficulty and with a considerable super-majority.

  2. Ilene Skeen says:

    Transfer of ownership with conditions imposed by the government are not only immoral but unnecessary. Let’s face the facts here. The US is going bankrupt. The national parks are a wonderful part of our heritage, but people are going to need to think of buying shares, first of all. Second of all, a single huge corporation that would be a national park service would NOT be self-supporting because the national organization would be too big to maintain it properly at the distances required. There are so many people who like parks that we would all be better off if we could own shares in a park near us, so that we can go there, keep and eye on it, etc.

    In the old days, many businesses bought whole mountains and although they quarried them or used them for timber, much of the land was unused. A business could run a park on its land, charge a fee, give you discounts on their stuff, etc. Not everyone private park has to be a theme park to make a some money in a truly free economy, and nature parks will make excellent publicity for many businesses like EMS, REI, etc. In a voluntary society, we have to remember that prices would be continually dropping (because that is what capitalism does). Without huge real estate taxes, land would not become a burden. It would be a true treasure. The best treasures are not only something you admire, but that brings more to you.

    We are too used to government restrictions, false premises and propaganda. If you really love parks, you should be thinking about which ones you would want to buy shares in, what kind of mission you would like to see them propose, what kind of budget they will need, how they will balance the renewable and mineral resource use with the availability of scenic beauty and natural walks, hikes, etc.

    Personally, I would buy shares in some of the most famous, but I would really like to participate in the ones close to home which I could visit often and proudly enjoy.

  3. James Robberts says:

    James Robberts
    October 17, 2012

    Don’t stop there. Dismantle government indoctrinaire education: establish for-profit private education!!! It will to wonders to free individual young minds to create.

  4. […] foreign tourists, NPS employees and others, let’s revisit SEPARATE!’s solution to the problem: National Parks Inc. This would liberate our National Parks from the arbitrary influence of warring coalitions in […]

Fire away!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Welcome to SEPARATE!

%d bloggers like this: