The ABC of Old World Morality


April 16, 2013 by Anders Ingemarson

I think of the U.S. Constitution as the political blueprint for the New World. It is radically different from the political systems of the Old World. Theirs are built on religion, race, geography or some other more or less arbitrary foundation. Ours is built on the idea that all men have unalienable Rights to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. The Constitution, with its checks and balances, protect those rights.

Similarly, I consider the Declaration of Independence the moral blueprint for The New World. We have unalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. This is a profoundly moral statement. Rights are good as opposed to Wrongs which are bad. Right and wrong, good and bad: the essence of morality.

Despite the Founders’ magnificent accomplishments, we find ourselves in deep trouble today. Something has gone terribly wrong. Some say we have ignored the Constitution. There’s some truth to that. But on a more fundamental level we have ignored the Declaration of Independence.

Instead of acknowledging that the Constitution, the political blueprint for the New World, is rooted in the Declaration, the moral blueprint for the New World, we have divorced the two. Why?

To have unalienable Rights to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness is not just any moral statement. It’s a moral statement of self-interest, of rational selfishness: You (and everybody else) have the unalienable rights to your life, your liberty, and your pursuit of your happiness.

Here’s the problem. Instead of embracing the moral blueprint for the New World we have held on to what I call the ABC of Old World Morality:

A – Altruism

B – Brother’s Keeper

C – Common Good

What moral code does the ABC represent? You guessed it: the morality of sacrifice.

Altruism, the basic principle of which is that man has no right to exist for his own sake, that service to others is the only justification for his existence, and that self-sacrifice is his highest moral duty, virtue and value.

Brother’s Keeper, the notion that we live to serve others.

Common Good, meaning that the good of some men, always defined as a collective—the class, the race, the age group, the gender, the sexual preference, the nationality, or just vaguely “the country”—takes precedence over the good of others, with those others consigned to the status of sacrificial animals.

And girls, don’t feel left out: Brother’s Keepers includes Sister’s Keepers as well.

So we’re faced with a contradiction. On the one hand, the Declaration, the moral blueprint for the New World, proclaims our rights to be self-interested, to be rationally selfish. On the other, the ABC of Old World Morality preaches the virtue of sacrifice.

Morality trumps politics. As long as sacrifice is considered virtuous no Constitution in the world will in the long run be able to protect your rights to be self-interested. As long as the ABC of Old World Morality rules the day, no checks and balances will be able to protect your unalienable rights to your life, your liberty and your pursuit of your happiness.

This is why the collectivists have been able to chip away at our freedoms for the past 100+ years. You don’t believe me? Try to come up with an argument in favor of a government program that does not use ABC as its justification—government (“public”) education, taxes, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, government infrastructure spending, environmental regulation, health care regulation, food regulation, anti-trust regulation, any regulation. See what I mean?

In creating the U.S. Constitution as the political blueprint for the New World, our Founding Fathers were political revolutionaries. To finish what they started, we have to become moral revolutionaries. We have to resurrect the Declaration of Independence as the moral blueprint for the New World. We have to fight an intellectual revolutionary war against the collectivist aggressors who use the ABC of Old World Morality as their weapon. I’ve picked my battle: championing the moral case for separating state and the economy. Waste no time finding yours.

6 thoughts on “The ABC of Old World Morality

  1. Melissa says:

    Enjoy your blogs, but the photo of you looks like something one might see in the paper after a mass shooting. Might get a more down to earth photo? 🙂


  2. Michael Rivers says:

    There’s one big thing missing from the Constitution, and the name of your blog says it all.


  3. Mike says:

    Sadly, the constitution doesn’t enforce itself. You need a culture which accepts the moral basis of the constitution. But the culture keeps changing. Even the church, with the incentives of heaven and hell, has evolved over time. How can we maintain a culture of individuality over the ages?


  4. Great Article, I agree. One more thing that the constitution does not cover is that of the Islamic “Religion” which is more of a trojan horse political system that uses freedom of religion for infiltration for countries that allow its entrance. I feel that this chipping away and grinding down of the concept of Liberty is going to continue and has reached critical mass. Those in power have too much control and the people too dumbed down. It is going to take a major revolution probably in the form of world war at some point to go through and only then will we see if Liberty survives. Our Sacrifice is going to be in the form of the fight for Liberty. Those who are enjoying the most Freedom right now are those abusing the system, taking the handouts and demanding their social justice for special privileges for those groups, at the expense of the White Male.


Fire away!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Welcome to SEPARATE!

%d bloggers like this: